Fifa stands by comments made last week by president Gianni Infantino in which he said that "the Iranian team is coming, for sure".
from BBC News https://ift.tt/6AnHj59
Thursday, 23 April 2026
Wednesday, 22 April 2026
Fernandes would win Ballon d'Or at Man City - Pogba
Paul Pogba believes Manchester United captain Bruno Fernandes would be in contention to win the Ballon d'Or if he played for a team like Manchester City.
from BBC News https://ift.tt/vMxTp9J
from BBC News https://ift.tt/vMxTp9J
Tuesday, 21 April 2026
Wembanyama wins NBA award with 100% of vote
San Antonio Spurs centre Victor Wembanyama is named the first unanimous winner of the NBA's defensive player of the year award.
from BBC News https://ift.tt/XLYspok
from BBC News https://ift.tt/XLYspok
Monday, 20 April 2026
How Haaland and Gabriel went head-to-head in 'old school battle'
Match of the Day pundits Wayne Rooney and Danny Murphy discuss how "two top players" in Erling Haaland and Gabriel went head-to-head in Manchester City's 2-1 victory against Arsenal.
from BBC News https://ift.tt/9Y8oBlN
from BBC News https://ift.tt/9Y8oBlN
Sunday, 19 April 2026
Why Man City 'leg-beaters' can make difference against Arsenal - Pulis
Tony Pulis explains why Manchester City's attacking players could prove to be their match-winners in Sunday's Premier League title showdown with leaders Arsenal.
from BBC News https://ift.tt/V9hGbLw
from BBC News https://ift.tt/V9hGbLw
Saturday, 18 April 2026
New top story on Hacker News: Claude Code Opus 4.7 keeps checking on malware
Claude Code Opus 4.7 keeps checking on malware
3 by decide1000 | 0 comments on Hacker News.
So during development, at every task I start, I see a line like this: `Own bug file — not malware.` It seems that it's obsessively checking if it's working on malware production. In another situation where I was working on a parser of a HTML document with JS, it refused because it believed that I was bypassing security measurements. I believe AI has to be supportive in the work that I'm doing. When it's obsessively checking me if I am doing anything wrong or abusing the system, I have the feeling it is controlling me. I understand that we do have guardrails and I also understand that it's very important that people do not abuse this new tech for bad stuff. I pay $200 per month for a max subscription. They already know who I am. Claude knows I work in scraper tech, and it also knows that our clients are the companies we scrape. Now with Opus 4.7, I've had a situation that it refused to continue because I asked to automate the cookie creation with a Chrome extension. In a situation where someone is abusing the system, let's say create malware or hacking stuff with bad intentions. I can imagine there will be some signal system or algorithm that can form an opinion about the intentions that someone has. But now that the AI is limiting me in my work, I feel a little bit disrupted. Who the hell does this system think he is to limit me? Am I going to accept this in the future? That a system will tell me that I cannot continue because I don't have sufficient rights or beliefs that I'm doing anything wrong. I can work fine on the local AI on my Blackwell GPU. But of course, I want to use the latest tech, the latest AI and the best models available. Is this the beginning of a split? Where good people and naughty people make different choices? Am I the bad guy now? Last year I passed 40. I grew up reading, talking about Kevin Mitnick. I was a member of a local computer club. Hacking stuff as a 14-year-old kid who did not have intentions to break anything but to outsmart systems. Is that area gone now? Is the newer generation going to accept that they have to please the AI?
3 by decide1000 | 0 comments on Hacker News.
So during development, at every task I start, I see a line like this: `Own bug file — not malware.` It seems that it's obsessively checking if it's working on malware production. In another situation where I was working on a parser of a HTML document with JS, it refused because it believed that I was bypassing security measurements. I believe AI has to be supportive in the work that I'm doing. When it's obsessively checking me if I am doing anything wrong or abusing the system, I have the feeling it is controlling me. I understand that we do have guardrails and I also understand that it's very important that people do not abuse this new tech for bad stuff. I pay $200 per month for a max subscription. They already know who I am. Claude knows I work in scraper tech, and it also knows that our clients are the companies we scrape. Now with Opus 4.7, I've had a situation that it refused to continue because I asked to automate the cookie creation with a Chrome extension. In a situation where someone is abusing the system, let's say create malware or hacking stuff with bad intentions. I can imagine there will be some signal system or algorithm that can form an opinion about the intentions that someone has. But now that the AI is limiting me in my work, I feel a little bit disrupted. Who the hell does this system think he is to limit me? Am I going to accept this in the future? That a system will tell me that I cannot continue because I don't have sufficient rights or beliefs that I'm doing anything wrong. I can work fine on the local AI on my Blackwell GPU. But of course, I want to use the latest tech, the latest AI and the best models available. Is this the beginning of a split? Where good people and naughty people make different choices? Am I the bad guy now? Last year I passed 40. I grew up reading, talking about Kevin Mitnick. I was a member of a local computer club. Hacking stuff as a 14-year-old kid who did not have intentions to break anything but to outsmart systems. Is that area gone now? Is the newer generation going to accept that they have to please the AI?
Otter mayhem after 'challenging beast' sneaks into garden centre
A fishing net had to be used to capture the "challenging beast" in a south of Scotland store.
from BBC News https://ift.tt/BJeq6HX
from BBC News https://ift.tt/BJeq6HX
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)